black holes and gray matter. in one thousand tangos.

             
Paul Krugman: Money & Morals

Lately inequality has re-entered the national conversation. Occupy Wall Street gave the issue visibility, while the Congressional Budget Office supplied hard data on the widening income gap. And the myth of a classless society has been exposed: Among rich countries, America stands out as the place where economic and social status is most likely to be inherited. So you knew what was going to happen next. Suddenly, conservatives are telling us that it’s not really about money; it’s about morals. Never mind wage stagnation and all that, the real problem is the collapse of working-class family values, which is somehow the fault of liberals. But is it really all about morals? No, it’s mainly about money. […]

Still, something is clearly happening to the traditional working-class family. The question is what. And it is, frankly, amazing how quickly and blithely conservatives dismiss the seemingly obvious answer: A drastic reduction in the work opportunities available to less-educated men.

Most of the numbers you see about income trends in America focus on households rather than individuals, which makes sense for some purposes. But when you see a modest rise in incomes for the lower tiers of the income distribution, you have to realize that all — yes, all — of this rise comes from the women, both because more women are in the paid labor force and because women’s wages aren’t as much below male wages as they used to be.

For lower-education working men, however, it has been all negative. Adjusted for inflation, entry-level wages of male high school graduates have fallen 23 percent since 1973. Meanwhile, employment benefits have collapsed. In 1980, 65 percent of recent high-school graduates working in the private sector had health benefits, but, by 2009, that was down to 29 percent.

So we have become a society in which less-educated men have great difficulty finding jobs with decent wages and good benefits. Yet somehow we’re supposed to be surprised that such men have become less likely to participate in the work force or get married, and conclude that there must have been some mysterious moral collapse caused by snooty liberals. […]

So we should reject the attempt to divert the national conversation away from soaring inequality toward the alleged moral failings of those Americans being left behind. Traditional values aren’t as crucial as social conservatives would have you believe — and, in any case, the social changes taking place in America’s working class are overwhelmingly the consequence of sharply rising inequality, not its cause.

/ Show
  1. andrewneidhardt reblogged this from kateoplis
  2. danpeterson2 reblogged this from kateoplis
  3. bebegirl77 reblogged this from kateoplis
  4. whatgodzillasaidtogod reblogged this from kateoplis
  5. whammsheadlandii reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    I reblogged because even though this feels very political, it shouldn’t be.
  6. threesmorefun reblogged this from drsarahjensen
  7. randomkirtana reblogged this from kateoplis
  8. 3queensome reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    A crucial issue that applies everywhere, not just the US.
  9. b3nz3drina reblogged this from kateoplis
  10. qristina reblogged this from kateoplis
  11. drsarahjensen reblogged this from kateoplis
  12. rdakotapdx reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    Like the old bumper sticker said: If you are not outraged, you are not paying attention.
  13. billionaire-in-training reblogged this from kateoplis
  14. heatherwpetty reblogged this from kdhart
  15. kdhart reblogged this from kateoplis
  16. supacat5 reblogged this from kateoplis
  17. whatimeantwasthis reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    :: This conversation is long overdue.
  18. dispophoto reblogged this from kateoplis
  19. luckintheshadows reblogged this from kateoplis
  20. jerriann reblogged this from kateoplis
  21. hiqus reblogged this from kateoplis
blog comments powered by Disqus
©2011 Kateoplis