black holes and gray matter. in one thousand tangos.

             
'Bully': Behind Every Harassed Child? A Whole Lot of Clueless Adults

“Bully,” Lee Hirsch’s moving and troubling documentary about the misery some children inflict upon others, arrives at a moment when bullying, long tolerated as a fact of life, is being redefined as a social problem. “Just kids being kids” can no longer be an acceptable response to the kind of sustained physical and emotional abuse that damages the lives of young people whose only sin is appearing weak or weird to their peers.

And while the film focuses on the specific struggles of five families in four states, it is also about — and part of — the emergence of a movement. It documents a shift in consciousness of the kind that occurs when isolated, oppressed individuals discover that they are not alone and begin the difficult work of altering intolerable conditions widely regarded as normal.

The feeling of aloneness is one of the most painful consequences of bullying. It is also, in some ways, a cause of it, since it is almost always socially isolated children (the new kid, the fat kid, the gay kid, the strange kid) who are singled out for mistreatment. For some reason — for any number of reasons that hover unspoken around the edges of Mr. Hirsch’s inquiry — adults often fail to protect their vulnerable charges. […]

But while we are on the subject of adult failures, it should be noted that the Motion Picture Association of America’s ratings board, by insisting on an R rating for “Bully,” has made it harder for young audiences to see. The Weinstein Company, which is distributing the film, has released it without a rating after the association denied its appeal and after a widely publicized petition drive was unable to change the board’s mind.

There is a little swearing in the movie, and a lot of upsetting stuff, but while some of it may shock parents, very little of it is likely to surprise their school-age children. Whose sensitivity does the association suppose it is protecting? The answer is nobody’s: That organization, like the panicked educators in the film itself, holds fast to its rigid, myopic policies to preserve its own authority. The members of the ratings board perform a useful function, but this is not the first time they’ve politicianed us.

/ Show
  1. who-cares-so-what reblogged this from kateoplis
  2. fionaelle reblogged this from iguessthisisme
  3. iguessthisisme reblogged this from wespeakfortheearth
  4. little-grey-cells reblogged this from kateoplis
  5. srbakerasa reblogged this from kateoplis
  6. milyi-misha reblogged this from kalooeh
  7. eriktheblack reblogged this from kateoplis
  8. evillordzog reblogged this from kateoplis
  9. omniacausafiuntt reblogged this from kateoplis
  10. vicster reblogged this from silas216
  11. kalooeh reblogged this from kateoplis
  12. citlalyy reblogged this from kateoplis
  13. silas216 reblogged this from kateoplis
  14. sorry-was-all-i-could-be reblogged this from kateoplis
  15. barbiekaykay reblogged this from kateoplis
  16. anabundanceofsarcasm reblogged this from lindsayface47 and added:
    I’m so glad this movie was made, though I don’t think I could sit through it. When we moved to the South, I was the new...
  17. littleichabod reblogged this from wespeakfortheearth
  18. domofosho reblogged this from kateoplis
  19. xpianostarsong reblogged this from deus-ex-musica
  20. deus-ex-musica reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    The MPAA is an antiquated, corrupt organization that (in my opinion) does not perform any essential function other than...
  21. xollos reblogged this from wearetheperfecttrap
  22. dynamikequilibrium reblogged this from kateoplis
  23. the-polish-one reblogged this from kateoplis
  24. viviano reblogged this from kateoplis
  25. nealtacular reblogged this from kateoplis
  26. newsfrompoems reblogged this from kateoplis
  27. foreveryourslauren reblogged this from kateoplis
  28. createdd reblogged this from kateoplis
blog comments powered by Disqus
©2011 Kateoplis