black holes and gray matter. in one thousand tangos.

             
Art’s Sale Value? Zero. The Tax Bill? $29 Million.

What is the fair market value of an object that cannot be sold? The question may sound like a Zen koan, but it is one that lawyers for the heirs of the New York art dealer Ileana Sonnabend and the Internal Revenue Service are set to debate when they meet in Washington next month.
The object under discussion is “Canyon,” a masterwork of 20th-century art created by Robert Rauschenberg that Mrs. Sonnabend’s children inherited when she died in 2007.
Because the work, a sculptural combine, includes a stuffed bald eagle, a bird under federal protection, the heirs would be committing a felony if they ever tried to sell it. So their appraisers have valued the work at zero.
But the Internal Revenue Service takes a different view. It has appraised “Canyon” at $65 million and is demanding that the owners pay $29.2 million in taxes.

Read on. 

Art’s Sale Value? Zero. The Tax Bill? $29 Million.

What is the fair market value of an object that cannot be sold? The question may sound like a Zen koan, but it is one that lawyers for the heirs of the New York art dealer Ileana Sonnabend and the Internal Revenue Service are set to debate when they meet in Washington next month.

The object under discussion is “Canyon,” a masterwork of 20th-century art created by Robert Rauschenberg that Mrs. Sonnabend’s children inherited when she died in 2007.

Because the work, a sculptural combine, includes a stuffed bald eagle, a bird under federal protection, the heirs would be committing a felony if they ever tried to sell it. So their appraisers have valued the work at zero.

But the Internal Revenue Service takes a different view. It has appraised “Canyon” at $65 million and is demanding that the owners pay $29.2 million in taxes.

Read on

/ Show
  1. lthompsonphoto reblogged this from kateoplis
  2. danachang reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    This is always something I have been intrigued by- how do you value anything at all? It’s so relative. We say that we...
  3. tsarcasms reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    that’s fucked, yo
  4. graphdeville reblogged this from kateoplis
  5. across-the-wire reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    What to do, what to do..
  6. tayloralexandrat reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    Rauschenberg, one of my favorite artists! Interesting story with regards to his piece.
  7. akatreadsinbrookline reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    Very interesting conundrum.
  8. lovenat reblogged this from kateoplis
  9. imriela reblogged this from maichan808 and added:
    WHAAAAAAAAAAAT >_
  10. maichan808 reblogged this from kateoplis
  11. ihavethelamest reblogged this from kateoplis
  12. huesodecristal reblogged this from kateoplis
  13. fearistheheartoflovexo reblogged this from kateoplis
  14. luciddistortion reblogged this from kateoplis
  15. marieandpierre reblogged this from kateoplis
  16. margielalalove reblogged this from kateoplis
  17. widening-gyre reblogged this from kateoplis
  18. recreate-impossible reblogged this from kateoplis
  19. heathernicolezilla reblogged this from un and added:
    Oh hey…it’s against the law for YOU to make money off of your own property but not for the IRS to make money off of it.
  20. emeraldsavage reblogged this from kateoplis
  21. myrmidon-ribbon reblogged this from kateoplis
  22. okorogariist reblogged this from kateoplis and added:
    That’s some fuckery right there .
  23. le-style-eternal reblogged this from kateoplis
blog comments powered by Disqus
©2011 Kateoplis