black holes and gray matter. in one thousand tangos.

             
A pilot uses the FlySmart with Airbus app on an Apple iPad
"In September, a passenger was arrested in El Paso after refusing to turn off his cellphone as the plane was landing. In October, a man in Chicago was arrested because he used his iPad during takeoff. In November, half a dozen police cars raced across the tarmac at La Guardia Airport in New York, surrounding a plane as if there were a terrorist on board. They arrested a 30-year-old man who had also refused to turn off his phone while on the runway. […]
Dealing with the F.A.A. on this topic is like arguing with a stubborn teenager. The agency has no proof that electronic devices can harm a plane’s avionics, but it still perpetuates such claims, spreading irrational fear among millions of fliers. A year ago, when I first asked Les Dorr, a spokesman for the F.A.A., why the rule existed, he said the agency was being cautious because there was no proof that device use was completely safe. He also said it was because passengers needed to pay attention during takeoff.
When I asked why I can read a printed book but not a digital one, the agency changed its reasoning. I was told by another F.A.A. representative that it was because an iPad or Kindle could put out enough electromagnetic emissions to disrupt the flight. Yet a few weeks later, the F.A.A. proudly announced that pilots could now use iPads in the cockpit instead of paper flight manuals.
The F.A.A. then told me that “two iPads are very different than 200.” But experts at EMT Labs, an independent testing facility in Mountain View, Calif., say there is no difference in radio output between two iPads and 200. “Electromagnetic energy doesn’t add up like that,” said Kevin Bothmann, the EMT Labs testing manager. […]
The F.A.A. should check out an annual report issued by NASA that compiles cases involving electronic devices on planes. None of those episodes have produced scientific evidence that a device can harm a plane’s operation. Reports of such interference have been purely speculation by pilots about the cause of a problem.”
FAA still has no proof that electronic devices harm a plane’s avionics

A pilot uses the FlySmart with Airbus app on an Apple iPad

"In September, a passenger was arrested in El Paso after refusing to turn off his cellphone as the plane was landing. In October, a man in Chicago was arrested because he used his iPad during takeoff. In November, half a dozen police cars raced across the tarmac at La Guardia Airport in New York, surrounding a plane as if there were a terrorist on board. They arrested a 30-year-old man who had also refused to turn off his phone while on the runway. […]

Dealing with the F.A.A. on this topic is like arguing with a stubborn teenager. The agency has no proof that electronic devices can harm a plane’s avionics, but it still perpetuates such claims, spreading irrational fear among millions of fliers. A year ago, when I first asked Les Dorr, a spokesman for the F.A.A., why the rule existed, he said the agency was being cautious because there was no proof that device use was completely safe. He also said it was because passengers needed to pay attention during takeoff.

When I asked why I can read a printed book but not a digital one, the agency changed its reasoning. I was told by another F.A.A. representative that it was because an iPad or Kindle could put out enough electromagnetic emissions to disrupt the flight. Yet a few weeks later, the F.A.A. proudly announced that pilots could now use iPads in the cockpit instead of paper flight manuals.

The F.A.A. then told me that “two iPads are very different than 200.” But experts at EMT Labs, an independent testing facility in Mountain View, Calif., say there is no difference in radio output between two iPads and 200. “Electromagnetic energy doesn’t add up like that,” said Kevin Bothmann, the EMT Labs testing manager. […]

The F.A.A. should check out an annual report issued by NASA that compiles cases involving electronic devices on planes. None of those episodes have produced scientific evidence that a device can harm a plane’s operation. Reports of such interference have been purely speculation by pilots about the cause of a problem.

FAA still has no proof that electronic devices harm a plane’s avionics

/ Show
  1. dreamerhiker reblogged this from kateoplis
  2. deerinthebasement reblogged this from boxofnillawafers
  3. paintmyspiritgolden reblogged this from boxofnillawafers
  4. nicoleainthere reblogged this from boxofnillawafers
  5. qlower reblogged this from boxofnillawafers
  6. waltermeramelo reblogged this from david
  7. foreverweerd reblogged this from david and added:
    Not surprising. :/
  8. sylverfox reblogged this from david
  9. denacimiento reblogged this from david
  10. xj0j0x3 reblogged this from eeyore-x
  11. eeyore-x reblogged this from kateoplis
  12. forksnspoons-vs-sporks reblogged this from kateoplis
  13. amorpxo reblogged this from kateoplis
  14. kylelibra reblogged this from david
  15. fourscoreandsevenyears reblogged this from mostlyjudson
  16. arirosie reblogged this from datzialltho
  17. datzialltho reblogged this from david
  18. mostlyjudson reblogged this from ashyaelizabeth
  19. anderbrosinthetardis reblogged this from girl-who-likes-books
  20. girl-who-likes-books reblogged this from drinkingsomewater
  21. drinkingsomewater reblogged this from holywaterandsonicscrewdrivers
  22. atexasgirlslife reblogged this from david and added:
    Here’s a plan. Get a small plane. And radio control it like a drone. Place cell phones, laptops, iPads, Kindles, nooks,...
  23. brownskinnedbeauty reblogged this from damnhebig and added:
    Umm electromagnetic emissions that such devices like cell phones and iPads give off can be harmful when used on an...
  24. rabidmunky reblogged this from wes-eskimo
  25. wes-eskimo reblogged this from damnhebig
  26. damnhebig reblogged this from david and added:
    Why can’t I use my electronics?Because fuck you, that’s why.
  27. pragmaticwishes reblogged this from david
  28. lighttothelight reblogged this from kateoplis
  29. skeletr reblogged this from bryan
  30. dawnofthefox reblogged this from maxistentialist
blog comments powered by Disqus
©2011 Kateoplis