black holes and gray matter. in one thousand tangos.

             
Why was NYT’s executive editor Jill Abramson fired today, and replaced by managing editor Dean Baquet, less than three years after she was appointed the first woman in the top job? 
"Several weeks ago, I’m told, Abramson discovered that her pay and her pension benefits as both executive editor and, before that, as managing editor were considerably less than the pay and pension benefits of Bill Keller, the male editor whom she replaced in both jobs. “She confronted the top brass,” one close associate said, and this may have fed into the management’s narrative that she was “pushy,” a characterization that, for many, has an inescapably gendered aspect.
Sulzberger [the paper’s publisher] is known to believe that the Times, as a financially beleaguered newspaper, needed to retreat on some of its generous pay and pension benefits; Abramson had also been at the Times for far fewer years than Keller, having spent much of her career at the Wall Street Journal, accounting for some of the pension disparity. (I was also told by another friend of hers that the pay gap with Keller has since been closed.) But, to women at an institution that was once sued by its female employees for discriminatory practices, the question brings up ugly memories. Whether Abramson was right or wrong, both sides were left unhappy. [Update: A third associate told me, “She found out that a former deputy managing editor”—a man—“made more money than she did” while she was managing editor. “She had a lawyer make polite inquiries about the pay and pension disparities, which set them off.”]”
"Even though she thought she was politely asking about the pay discrepancy and about the role of the business side, and that she had a green light from management to hire a deputy to Baquet, the decision to terminate her was made. Sulzberger met with her last Friday, and reportedly told her that it was time to make ‘a change.’"
The New Yorker
Fun fact: Jill Abramson once admitted to having a tattoo of the “amazing ‘T’ in The New York Times newspaper” on her back. 
Pity.

Why was NYT’s executive editor Jill Abramson fired today, and replaced by managing editor Dean Baquet, less than three years after she was appointed the first woman in the top job? 

"Several weeks ago, I’m told, Abramson discovered that her pay and her pension benefits as both executive editor and, before that, as managing editor were considerably less than the pay and pension benefits of Bill Keller, the male editor whom she replaced in both jobs. “She confronted the top brass,” one close associate said, and this may have fed into the management’s narrative that she was “pushy,” a characterization that, for many, has an inescapably gendered aspect.

Sulzberger [the paper’s publisher] is known to believe that the Times, as a financially beleaguered newspaper, needed to retreat on some of its generous pay and pension benefits; Abramson had also been at the Times for far fewer years than Keller, having spent much of her career at the Wall Street Journal, accounting for some of the pension disparity. (I was also told by another friend of hers that the pay gap with Keller has since been closed.) But, to women at an institution that was once sued by its female employees for discriminatory practices, the question brings up ugly memories. Whether Abramson was right or wrong, both sides were left unhappy. [Update: A third associate told me, “She found out that a former deputy managing editor”—a man—“made more money than she did” while she was managing editor. “She had a lawyer make polite inquiries about the pay and pension disparities, which set them off.”]”

"Even though she thought she was politely asking about the pay discrepancy and about the role of the business side, and that she had a green light from management to hire a deputy to Baquet, the decision to terminate her was made. Sulzberger met with her last Friday, and reportedly told her that it was time to make ‘a change.’"

The New Yorker

Fun fact: Jill Abramson once admitted to having a tattoo of the “amazing ‘T’ in The New York Times newspaper” on her back.

Pity.

/ Show
  1. delightfulruminations reblogged this from kateoplis
  2. political-fanatic reblogged this from kateoplis
  3. watchmenotgiveafuck reblogged this from kateoplis
  4. slumber-pumps reblogged this from kateoplis
  5. jaygatsbyandtheoldsports reblogged this from debussigh
  6. debussigh reblogged this from themeatandsarcasmgirl
  7. themeatandsarcasmgirl reblogged this from staringatsuns
  8. femininecollective reblogged this from kateoplis
  9. thereelingnightshowhost reblogged this from kateoplis
  10. oftheworldandwhispersnotyetheard reblogged this from kateoplis
  11. explosivecharters reblogged this from realgrantaire
  12. spangledshieldsandandsilverwings reblogged this from penguinsayswhat
  13. penguinsayswhat reblogged this from kateoplis
  14. magnificentshibe reblogged this from kateoplis
  15. supreme-shieldmaiden reblogged this from kateoplis
  16. zune-politikon reblogged this from crowmygod
  17. crowmygod reblogged this from kylegreggy
  18. kqadams reblogged this from kateoplis
  19. shessouncool reblogged this from kateoplis
  20. theflobear reblogged this from ambiguityftw
  21. ellesnoelle reblogged this from kateoplis
  22. commodification reblogged this from ambiguityftw
  23. anyoneseenick reblogged this from unetatpluselevedeconscience
  24. ambiguityftw reblogged this from kateoplis
  25. tootiepants reblogged this from comickibitzer and added:
    sickening
  26. panoramiccolors reblogged this from kateoplis
  27. unetatpluselevedeconscience reblogged this from sensiblestupidity
  28. funkyfifty reblogged this from kateoplis
  29. frangis45 reblogged this from kateoplis
blog comments powered by Disqus
©2011 Kateoplis